| Report                     
      from 
      Europe                       
         
       EU trade in wood furniture rises in 2014The sharp rise in the EU trade surplus in wooden furniture
 between 2010 and 2013 came to a halt last year as the pace
 of increase in EU exports slowed while there was an
 upturn in imports (Chart 1).
  
      EU28 wooden furniture exports were valued at €8.43
 billion in 2014, 2.3% more than in 2013. EU28 imports of
 wooden furniture were valued at €5.11 billion in 2014,
 10.4% greater than the previous year.
  
      The EU 28‟s trade surplus in wooden furniture fell 8.2%
 from €3.62 billion in 2013 to €3.32 billion in 2014.
  
      Nevertheless, the trade surplus remains very highcompared to the boom years prior to the financial crises
 when European manufacturers were focusing most of their
 attention on domestic sales and external suppliers, notably
 in China, were making significant inroads into the market.
  
        
      Putting these figures into perspective it will be seen thatEU external trade in wooden furniture is relatively small
 compared to total consumption, which is about €50 billion
 per year most of which is from domestic manufacturers.
  
      Only about one quarter of wooden furniture consumed in
 the EU member states ever crosses a national boundary.
 Total internal trade in wooden furniture between EU
 countries has averaged around €15 billion per year since
 2009.
  
      Exports of growing importance for EU furniture
 manufacturers
 While external trade forms only a small part of the EU
 furniture sector, it is becoming much more relevant to
 European furniture manufacturers.
  
      During the current recession, manufacturers have become
 more focused on improving competitiveness relative to
 manufacturers in other countries, particularly China. With
 consumption static in domestic markets, European
 furniture companies are seeking to increase sales in other
 parts of the world.
  
      This outward looking strategy has led to a consistent rise
 in EU wooden furniture exports over the last five years
 (Chart 2). In 2014, EU28 export values increased to North
 America (+15% to €1.48 billion), China (+17% to €570
 million), the Middle East (+3% to €900 million), and
 Africa (+11% to €520 million).
  
      These gains during 2014 offset a 9% decline in exports to
 the CIS region to €1.46 billion. Falling exports to the CIS
 are due mainly to slowing sales in Russia following
 economic sanctions in response to the Ukraine conflict and
 declining international prices for Russian oil and gas
 which has weakened the economy and affected consumer
 spending.
  
        
      The rise in EU exports of wooden furniture is being led bymanufacturers in Italy, Poland and Germany (Chart 3).
 Preliminary data for 2014 indicates that exports of wooden
 furniture (including intra-EU trade) increased from Italy
 (+4% to €5.25 billion), Poland (+12% to €4.14 billion) and
 Germany (+2% to €4.12 billion).
  
      Last year, Poland overtook Germany to become Europe‟s
 second largest exporter of wooden furniture. Wooden
 furniture exports have also been rising rapidly from
 Lithuania, Romania, Spain and Portugal in the last five
 years. However exports from Sweden and France have
 declined while exports from Denmark have been stable
 (Chart 3).
  
        
      EU wooden furniture imports rebounded in 2014After falling 14% in 2013, the value of EU wooden
 furniture imports rebounded by 10% in 2014 to reach
 €5.12 billion (Chart 4). Imports from China fell 16% in
 2013 but recovered by 14% to €2.81 billion in 2014.
  
      EU imports from the rest of the world also rebounded in
 2014, increasing 8% to €2.3 billion after a 13% decline in
 2013.
  
        
      EU imports of wooden furniture from Vietnam increasedstrongly last year, rising 19% to €596 million. This
 followed a 9% decline in 2013. After several years of
 declining sales, Indonesian wooden furniture recovered a
 little ground in the EU market in 2014, with imports rising
 7% to €296 million.
  
      There was also a 13% rise in imports from India to €132
 million. Imports from Malaysia and Brazil remained stable
 between 2013 and 2014 at €172 million and €106 million
 respectively (Chart 5).
  
        
      Analysis of economic indicators in Europe does notprovide an obvious explanation for the sharp fall in EU
 wooden furniture imports in 2013 and rebound in 2014.
 Throughout this period there was slow growth and flat
 consumer spending in the EU. Also exchange rates did not
 change significantly.
  
      However demand in the UK, which is the largest European
 importer of wooden furniture accounting for nearly one
 third of all imports from outside the EU, was recovering
 more strongly in 2014. There was also a particularly sharp
 increase in wooden furniture import penetration into
 Germany, France, Italy and Sweden last year.
 ﹛
  
      The EU wooden furniture import trend in the last twoyears may have been affected by supply side issues. Some
 new wooden furniture manufacturing capacity has come
 on-stream in Eastern Europe 每 notably in Poland,
 Lithuania and Romania每 and this may have depressed EU
 imports from other regions in 2013.
  
      In 2014, slowing in China‟s domestic market may have reenergised
 efforts by Chinese and other Asian
 manufacturers to increase sales in Europe.
  
      Another factor is introduction of the EUTR in March 2013
 which may have briefly disrupted EU imports of wooden
 furniture as retailers struggled to obtain necessary
 assurances of legal wood origin from their overseas
 suppliers. If so, the rebound in 2014 may be a sign that
 overseas suppliers have been able to satisfy these new
 regulatory demands.
  
      CSIL reports rise in global furniture trade to US$128
 billion
 The latest edition of World Furniture
 (www.worldfurnitureonline.com), the quarterly journal of
 the Italy-based furniture industry research association
 CSIL, includes a wide ranging review of recent
 developments in the international furniture sector.
  
      The CSIL analysis of world furniture trade, which draws
 on data from the world‟s 70 largest economies, indicates
 that total trade value was US$128 billion in 2013, around
 1% of all global trade in manufactured products. The
 leading furniture importers during the year were the
 United States, Germany, France, the UK and Canada.
  
      The annual trend in global furniture trade reported by
 CSIL is shown in Chart 6. In the period 2004 to 2008,
 global trade was rising driven primarily by imports into
 the United States, with smaller increases into the United
 Kingdom, France, Germany and Canada.
  
      Trade declined during the financial crises in 2009, but
 there was uninterrupted growth in the 2010 to 2013 period.
 This was driven mainly by recovery in North America and
 growth in emerging markets. The European market
 remained relatively weak during this period, although
 there was some growth in imports into Germany and the
 UK.
  
      CSIL estimates that growth in global trade continued into
 2014 and projected a further increase to close to US$140
 billion in 2015. Import penetration for furniture (measured
 as the ratio between imports and consumption) is presently
 about 30% on a world scale.
  
      According to CSIL, the main furniture exporting countries
 in 2013 were China, Italy, Germany, Poland and the
 United States. The relative positions of the main exporting
 countries changed considerably between 2004 and 2013.
  
      China has become the world's leading exporter, overtaking
 Italy which is currently in second position. Between 2004
 and 2013 China increased share of global furniture trade
 from 14% to 38%.
  
        
      Another major change is the rapid emergence of Vietnam,which jumped from 15th to 6th position in the period 2004
 to 2013.
  
      CSIL highlight that a significant proportion of furniture
 trade is more accurately described as ※intra-regional§
 rather than truly ※international§. This is particularly true
 of Europe.
  
      In the EU plus Norway, Switzerland and Iceland, 76% of
 trade takes place between countries within the region and
 only 24% is with countries in other parts of the world. In
 the NAFTA area (USA, Canada and Mexico), about 27%
 of foreign furniture trade is within the three countries and
 73% is with countries outside the region.
  
      In the Asia and Pacific region, about 39% of furniture
 trade is within the region.
  
      Western European furniture market recovers slowly
 The latest edition of World Furniture also provides CSIL‟s
 update on recent trends in furniture consumption and
 production in Western Europe. CSIL note that the region‟s
 furniture sector has faced significant difficulties in recent
 years but is now slowly recovering.
  
      CSIL estimate that total Western European furniture
 market value was €71 billion at producer prices in 2013, a
 slight downturn compared to the previous year and below
 pre-crises levels.
  
      However the market remains globally significant,
 accounting for one quarter of the value of world furniture
 consumption, 40% of world furniture import value and
 30% of world furniture export value. CSIL estimate that
 the market grew by 0.5% in 2014 and project 1% growth
 in 2015.
  
      CSIL identify the dominant markets in Western Europe asGermany, France, the UK and Italy. These four countries
 account for two thirds of total furniture demand in the
 region.
  
      Market performances have varied widely between
 countries. While several markets including Spain, Italy
 and France, are still well below pre-recession levels,
 others are performing well including Norway, Switzerland
 and Sweden.
  
      European specifiers need to be more flexible in their
 choice of hardwood
 Use of verified sustainable timber could be limited by
 specifiers being too restrictive in choice of species and
 certification scheme. This was the conclusion of a seminar
 on sustainable timber in government projects organised by
 the Netherlands Green Deal initiative reported in the
 ETTF newsletter.
  
      An alliance of industry, end users, retailers, NGOs and
 government including Tropenbos and the Royal
 Netherlands Timber Trade Association (NTTA) aims to
 make certified sustainable timber the Netherlands market
 norm. The seminar, under the title ※Stimulating
 Sustainable Forestry§, took place in Tiel at the
 Rivierenland Water Board (Waterschap).
  
      Delegates heard that certified sustainable timber has risen
 from 58% to 86% of NTTA members‟ total imports since
 2008. However, in hardwood certified material‟s share is
 only 55%, so ※considerable§ efforts were needed to boost
 sales, particularly in Netherland‟s key marine products
 sector, said speakers. One route to market growth, it was
 suggested, was to give contractors greater specification
 freedom.
  
      The Netherlands government‟s Timber Procurement
 Assessment Committee (TPAC) accepts FSC, PEFC and
 Malaysian MTCS certification as proof of sustainability.
 According to Annemieke Visser Winterink of the Probos
 forestry foundation, specifiers should therefore opt for
 material verified under any of these schemes, and focus on
 technical capabilities rather than specific species.
  
      ※By adhering to government certification criteria and
 specifying physical mechanical properties rather than
 species, you give contractors freedom of choice,§ she said.
 ※That not only potentially increases the quality and cost
 effctiveness of the project, but helps broaden use of wood
 from sustainably managed forests."
  
      International Hardwood Conference
 The ETTF will jointly host the 2015 International
 Hardwood Conference in Copenhagen on September 17
 2015 with the European Sawmillers Organisation (EOS).
 Consequently it will broaden to encompass non-European
 species, including tropical, as well as European
 hardwoods.
  
      European hardwood trade struggles with low
 profitability and investment
 The Annual Review published at the turn of the year by
 the Germany based EUWID journal provides a wealth of
 information on European and North American corporate
 investment, divestment and bankruptcies in the forest
 products sector during the previous 12 months. As such
 it‟s a rare and valuable insight into the underlying
 financials and direction of development of the sector as a
 whole.
  
      The hardwood sector, being generally dominated by
 smaller fragmented firms, does not feature strongly
 compared to the much larger more consolidated softwood
 and panels industries.
  
      However there are some interesting observations, most
 reinforcing the image of an industry struggling with low
 levels of investment and innovation and rising levels of
 competition.
  
      For example: In the European import trade, the main news
 in 2014 identified by EUWID was the break-up of Danish
 Group Dalhoff Larsen and Horneman A/S (DLH) which
 formerly had several large stock holding operations in
 Western Europe and was also a leading distributor of
 tropical wood into Eastern Europe.
  
      EUWID note that ※furthermore, other importers of tropical
 wood have also experienced economic difficulties. A
 prominent example in this context is the Swiss group
 Precious Woods Holding AG which in the third quarter of
 the year announced that continuation of its business was in
 jeopardy.
  
      In February German company B&T Wood Trading
 GmbH, Meerbeck, was compelled to submit an application
 for insolvency. Dutch company Zuid-Nederlandse
 Houtindustrie B.V. terminated its business activities in
 Octoner§.
  
      The rate of reduction in European sawmill capacity (both
 softwood and hardwood) during 2014 was much lower
 than in 2013. EUWID notes that ※the consolidation in the
 European sawmill sector which in the estimation of market
 participants continues to be necessary has not taken place
 this year§.
  
      The implication is that the domestic wood sector continues
 to suffer from a degree of over-capacity, always a problem
 for external suppliers selling into the market.
 On the other hand, nor is there any news of any large new
 investments in the European hardwood sawmilling sector
 during 2014.
  
      Similarly, there were very few new developments in
 European wood-based panel and surfaces sector in 2014
 after a large number of transactions in 2013.
  
      The European Luxury Vinyl Tiles (LVT) continues toexpand and, according to EUWID, this is likely at the
 expense of other material suppliers to the flooring sector.
  
      The main trend identified in the wood flooring sector is a
 continuing shift in production from Western to Eastern
 Europe, with reference made to new or expanding
 facilities in Lithuania, Romania and the Czech Republic.
 WPC taking greater share of European markets important
 for tropical wood.
  
      WPC is having a particularly significant impact in markets
 for exterior products in Germany, France, UK, Belgium,
 Netherlands and Spain. WPC products sold in Europe are
 mainly imported from the USA and China.
  
      This data needs to be considered alongside the decline in
 EU imports of tropical hardwood decking profiles from
 around 747,000 cu.m in 2007 to less than 300,000 cu.m in
 2013.
  
      It‟s clear that the expansion in EU consumption of WPC
 combined with the installation of around 300,000 cu.m of
 capacity for thermal treatment of temperate wood in
 Europe, not to mention expansion of capacity for
 acetylation and other forms of chemical treatment,
 presents a significant challenge to tropical wood in
 European markets for exterior products.
  
      AHEC highlight continuing focus on oak and walnut in
 European furniture
 A recent report from the American Hardwood Export
 Council (AHEC) reviews hardwood furniture trends based
 on a visit to the annual IMM furniture show in Germany.
  
      From observations and interviews at the show AHEC
 suggests that, after more than five years of poor sales and
 falling consumption, the market for high-end furniture in
 Europe is improving.
  
      As in previous years, designs in oak and walnut were
 dominant. Nearly all walnut was from the United States,
 while most oak was European. AHEC suggest this is
 primarily due to the easy access to European oak by
 Central European manufacturers.
  
      These manufacturers are also now able to utilise relatively
 low grades and short specifications which can be sourced
 very competitively. Increasing use of these grades has
 gone hand-in-hand with deliberate marketing of the
 ※rustic§ look in oak furniture. AHEC also suggest that
 solid wood is in vogue and there appears to be less veneer
 used than in the past.
  
      AHEC note that the only tropical wood on display was in
 the international section and mainly in the Indonesian
 pavilion. Temperate species other than oak and walnut
 were also not much in evidence. There was some beech,
 mostly for chairs and table legs but not for large visual
 surfaces of table tops and cabinet doors.
  
      AHEC observed that there was lack of strong
 environmental messages and branding at the show,
 surprising given that IMM Cologne is the main shop
 window for high end commercial furniture sold in Europe.
  
      Most furniture manufacturers apparently have yet to
 embrace LCA or EPDs for active market development 每
 although some companies are now considering this as a
 way to differentiate product in a highly competitive
 market.
  
      * The market information above has been generously provided
 by the Chinese Forest Products Index Mechanism (FPI)
 |